Gene expression microarray analysis of small, purified cell subsets

dc.contributor.advisorJames F. Leary, Ph.D.en_US
dc.contributor.committeeMemberWilliam R. Widger, Ph.D.en_US
dc.contributor.committeeMemberVictor E. Reyes, Ph.D.en_US
dc.contributor.committeeMemberDavid W. Niesel, Ph.D.en_US
dc.contributor.committeeMemberBruce A. Luxon, Ph.D.en_US
dc.creatorPeter Szaniszloen_US
dc.date.accessioned2011-12-20T16:05:32Z
dc.date.available2008-06-17en_US
dc.date.available2011-12-20T16:05:32Z
dc.date.created2007-11-15en_US
dc.date.issued2007-04-23en_US
dc.description.abstractGene expression microarray technology is potentially capable of examining all of the cellular processes at the mRNA level at a given moment. One major challenge in its applicability is that most biological samples are cell mixtures and the cell type of interest is often a minor cell subset. Using well-defined mixtures of model cell types with different cell ratios we found that the overall gene expression profile (GEP) of mixed cell populations was the weighted average of the GEPs for each cell subpopulation in the cell mixture. Thus, without applying any cell separation the cell type in majority dominated the overall GEP of the sample while the GEPs of minor cell subsets were diminished. We showed that the functional threshold for the necessary purity of a cell type in a sample to produce virtually identical overall GEP to a pure sample was 75% and this could be achieved by conventional cell sorting methods without altering the overall GEP in the process. For the purification of small, biohazardous samples, we tested the applicability of multistage magnetic sorting (Magsort) and laser enabled analysis and processing (LEAP). We developed optimized sample labeling and sorting protocols for both technologies and demonstrated that while the maximum purity we could achieve with Magsort was 75-80%, with the LEAP instrument we could purify fluorescently labeled cell subsets to 80-100%. The purified cells from biological samples often do not provide enough RNA for direct microarray studies without RNA amplification. We found that both linear and exponential amplification was capable of producing enough RNA for microarray analysis even from a single cell. Both methods distorted the GEP, however, with linear amplification much fewer genes were affected and only this method preserved the GEP differences between samples. Further studies are needed to analyze and possibly eliminate all GEP distortion. In conclusion, the purification of minor cell subsets from biological samples prior to microarray analysis is not only necessary, but also achievable without GEP distortion. Using linear RNA amplification of small purified samples, meaningful microarray data can be produced about the GEP of even a few cells.en_US
dc.format.mediumelectronicen_US
dc.identifier.otheretd-11152007-144628en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/2152.3/256
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.rightsCopyright © is held by the author. Presentation of this material on the TDL web site by The University of Texas Medical Branch at Galveston was made possible under a limited license grant from the author who has retained all copyrights in the works.en_US
dc.subjectRNA amplificationen_US
dc.subjectmultistage magnetic sortingen_US
dc.subjectmicrogenomicsen_US
dc.subjectlaser enabled analysis and processingen_US
dc.subjectgenomicsen_US
dc.subjectgene expression profileen_US
dc.subjectcell purificationen_US
dc.titleGene expression microarray analysis of small, purified cell subsetsen_US
dc.type.genredissertationen_US
dc.type.materialtexten_US
thesis.degree.departmentMicrobiology and Immunologyen_US
thesis.degree.grantorThe University of Texas Medical Branchen_US
thesis.degree.levelDoctoralen_US
thesis.degree.namePhDen_US

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
Peter-Szaniszlo-EDT-111507.pdf
Size:
9.5 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format

License bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
license.txt
Size:
891 B
Format:
Plain Text
Description: